The potential for houses in multiple occupation (HMO), to be more profitable than regular buy and let investments, is a reason why. HMO mortgages have been increasing in popularity. However, do landlords really need them? Will a traditional buy and let mortgage suffice?
Because this is a more complex type of property, lenders will not offer loans to such cases. However, those who are willing to offer them will likely have their own criteria.
HMO properties might be offered for sale with irresistible "100%+ gross returns". It's hard to imagine anyone not wanting a piece of this. Gross yields in HMOs are not good. There are significant costs involved, such as council tax, insurance and utility bills. Management costs include rent arrears, voids, and management costs. You might see a ROI of 8-10% for an HMO, as opposed to 4-5% for a single-tenancy Buy-to-Let.
HMOs are a popular choice for individual tenants because they are usually affordable and fully furnished with bills. This is particularly true for overseas workers, students and contractors who are working visas. HMOs offer the convenience of moving in quickly and at little expense.
These complex properties are not suitable for lenders who are less risk-averse. The ones that are will be able to offer financing will most likely have their own criteria.
HMOs are more difficult to manage than traditional buy-to-let models. Tenants can sometimes get irritated when they are sharing facilities within an HMO. You may also be a landlord and act as a mediator between tenants who do not see eye-to-eye.
A mortgage lender is never a good idea. It's not wise to approach them in the hopes of securing a loan. A specialist can ensure that the right lender is approached, and that you are eligible for the best rates. For more information, or to make an enquiry, simply contact our experts with your questions.